Direct TV vs. Dish Network?
Oct. 10th, 2007 12:28 pmWe currently have cable TV via Comcastic. Contrary to their marketing campaign, they are not comcastic: they are craptastic at best. Just last week, we observed 11 channels frozen for over 3 hours. Frequently, tv programs paused, garbled or lose audio. They suck.
I know satellite systems have their own issues: I've had Bell ExpressVu for some time. Still, we've reached the point where we're willing to bear the misc pains of satellite rather than continue with cable.
Does anyone have a strong opinion of Direct TV versus Dish Network? As near as we can tell, the channels we want are available on both and the prices aren't all that different.
Thoughts?
I know satellite systems have their own issues: I've had Bell ExpressVu for some time. Still, we've reached the point where we're willing to bear the misc pains of satellite rather than continue with cable.
Does anyone have a strong opinion of Direct TV versus Dish Network? As near as we can tell, the channels we want are available on both and the prices aren't all that different.
Thoughts?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-10 05:02 pm (UTC)AND, satellite is CHEAPER than cable for more channels, no matter what cable says! The only time it went out, was a severe thunderstorm that rumbled through, and that was for interference in the atmosphere, but it passed quickly. I probably should not have had TV on then anyway!
I think you would be pleased with either....I am in Colorado, so initially went with the Denver metro based company - Dish Network.