Southwest Changes the Cattle Call

I heard on NPR's Morning Edition while driving to work that Southwest Airlines is adjusting their traditional cattle call seating methodology.

For the uninitiated, Southwest doesn't do seat assignments. Instead, everyone is given a boarding pass with an "A," "B" or "C" on a first-come, first-served basis upon check-in, and each group is released onto the plane in order. You might be the first person at the gate, but if your boarding pass has a "C," two-thirds of the plane boards before you, including anyone who arrives at the last minute with an "A" or "B". Pre-boarding allowances are made for those needing assistance or families with children.

Under the new system, there are still no seat assignments and Southwest will still do the letter assignments but they also print a number to indicate your position in your respective corral. Effectively, your place in line will be held until you get to the gate. As a Southwest flier, this largely means that I'll still have a mad rush to check-in online from home precisely 24 hours before my flight, but there's no reason whatsoever to hurry to the gate since arriving early or late will have no impact in our choice of seats.

What I found most surprising is that Southwest is doing away with pre-boarding for families with children. Outside of opening themselves up to being bashed as non-family friendly, I'm not sure this adjustment will actually save any boarding time or appease their business customers. I'd rather families get a chance to be seated first so I can purposefully take a seat *away* from the potentially screaming babies or seat-kicking toddlers. Then again, perhaps appearing unfriendly to families will reduce the number of screaming & spewing babies and poorly parented children on Southwest flights.

Southwest Changes the Cattle Call

I heard on NPR's Morning Edition while driving to work that Southwest Airlines is adjusting their traditional cattle call seating methodology.

For the uninitiated, Southwest doesn't do seat assignments. Instead, everyone is given a boarding pass with an "A," "B" or "C" on a first-come, first-served basis upon check-in, and each group is released onto the plane in order. You might be the first person at the gate, but if your boarding pass has a "C," two-thirds of the plane boards before you, including anyone who arrives at the last minute with an "A" or "B". Pre-boarding allowances are made for those needing assistance or families with children.

Under the new system, there are still no seat assignments and Southwest will still do the letter assignments but they also print a number to indicate your position in your respective corral. Effectively, your place in line will be held until you get to the gate. As a Southwest flier, this largely means that I'll still have a mad rush to check-in online from home precisely 24 hours before my flight, but there's no reason whatsoever to hurry to the gate since arriving early or late will have no impact in our choice of seats.

What I found most surprising is that Southwest is doing away with pre-boarding for families with children. Outside of opening themselves up to being bashed as non-family friendly, I'm not sure this adjustment will actually save any boarding time or appease their business customers. I'd rather families get a chance to be seated first so I can purposefully take a seat *away* from the potentially screaming babies or seat-kicking toddlers. Then again, perhaps appearing unfriendly to families will reduce the number of screaming & spewing babies and poorly parented children on Southwest flights.

Par!

This morning, the Canadian dollar was at par with the US dollar. Only five years ago, the loonie was at $0.62 USD.

This says more about the relative weakness of the US dollar than anything else, and I see the weakness as directly related to enormous trade and budget deficits. While a weak US dollar might be useful to correct the trade imbalance, it's an uphill battle: as of last week, the US' largest trading partner isn't Canada but China, and China loosely pegs their currency to the US dollar in large part to maintain the trade imbalance in their favour.

Par!

This morning, the Canadian dollar was at par with the US dollar. Only five years ago, the loonie was at $0.62 USD.

This says more about the relative weakness of the US dollar than anything else, and I see the weakness as directly related to enormous trade and budget deficits. While a weak US dollar might be useful to correct the trade imbalance, it's an uphill battle: as of last week, the US' largest trading partner isn't Canada but China, and China loosely pegs their currency to the US dollar in large part to maintain the trade imbalance in their favour.