Cove Port appears to be the town closest to the termination of Interstate 70; I assume that this sign is on I-70 westbound. It now makes a little sense... the sign designer thought it was important to post the distance to the end of the highway.
The other three cities are all along I-70. Why Columbus, St. Louis and Denver rate a mention while Pittsburgh, Indianapolis and Kansas City do not is a mystery.
Hmm. Well, I've never gotten onto the Massachusetts Turnpike (I-90) at its easternmost point (I guess that's the airport, unless it's the I-93 interchange on the other side of the Ted), but I'd be really surprised if it had a sign giving the distance to Seattle.
I have (and yes, it's at Logan airport), and no, it doesn't. Seattle isn't mentioned anywhere along the part of I-90 that runs through Massachusetts; I don't think any of the signs mention anything west of the MA/NY border.
It runs within 20 miles of the center of Pittsburgh, close enough to be considered part of the local road system. If I was heading to Pittsburgh from Baltimore, I'd take I-70.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 11:37 pm (UTC)The other three cities are all along I-70. Why Columbus, St. Louis and Denver rate a mention while Pittsburgh, Indianapolis and Kansas City do not is a mystery.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 12:58 am (UTC)Taste?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 02:47 am (UTC)Just sayin'... ;{P}
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 02:29 pm (UTC)Smells better, too.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 02:42 am (UTC)maybe because Pittsburgh isn't actually ON I-70?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 02:59 am (UTC)Click the image for more detail.
It runs within 20 miles of the center of Pittsburgh, close enough to be considered part of the local road system. If I was heading to Pittsburgh from Baltimore, I'd take I-70.