I get that pandas are endangered and worthy of being saved. But that wasn't the point of any of the news stories: not a single one of them mentioned pandas in the wild, pandas as an endangered species, pandas as a barometer species or anything like. The focus was totally & exclusively this one cub at the National Zoo and that it died. Nothing else was deemed relevant or pertinent by the media. All opportunity for a bigger, more useful educational 30 second spot was ignored.

Because it was not even a half-story, it was worse than no story at all, IMHO.

I listen to Diane Rehm's program a great deal, although I usually turn it off when she starts taking calls from the public: too many people have a tendency to ramble, to be utterly unfocused and to spew uninformed rumours, and it drives me nuts. If I'm going to take the time to call into a national radio program, I'm going to concisely speak my piece as clearly as possible and try to be at least half-informed before dialing. Diane keeps most people in line but every call-in show on the radio --NPR and otherwise-- tend to suffer the same problem. Thank god for podcasts: I can skip over the weak portions while keeping the important parts.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

January 2021

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 11:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios