bjarvis: (Default)
[personal profile] bjarvis
I wish I could say I've made enormous progress at the gym, but I'm uncertain if there was actually any made.

By my measurements, my arms, chest, waist, weight and body fat composition are almost no different today than they were a year ago: I've added a half-inch to my chest, hips, upper arms and neck, but that's it. My percentage body fat was flat, as was my overall weight.

Despite the absence of changes in volume, I am stronger: my weight stack has increased over the year, especially the leg days.

Part of the problem was a shoulder blade injury in early summer which has kept me from doing a lot of back & shoulder exercises until lately. I'm not quite back onto my usual routine, but am not far off. Carpal tunnel issues still come up periodically as nearly everything I do has some component of gripping, lifting or pushing with my hands. That wouldn't be so bad except for the vast amounts of typing I do through the course of my day for work, among other things. Pacing and patience is required.



In December, I began modifying my gym routine: instead of three sets of 12 reps for most exercises, I'm now doing eight sets of eight reps with slightly less weight. The theory is that I'm still working muscles to exhaustion but emphasizing volume for each exercise rather than absolute muscle strain. In theory, this should also build up some muscle volume for visual aesthetics; I gladly admit that I'd like to look as good on the outside as I feel on the inside, and I have received some appreciative comments from time to time, noting that my workouts are making a visible difference.

This morning, I spent $99 for a DEXA scan. It's a head-to-toe pencil x-ray scan: lay down on the scanner bed while the x-ray emitter in an arm suspended over the table zips side-to-side as the arm itself travels the length of the bed. While these scans are most commonly used for measuring bone density --mine is 1.362 g/cm^2, a high level of density-- they are useful for measuring body fat. Indeed, it is the gold standard for measuring fat and can indicate percentages of body fat in various parts of the body.

From the scan, can say that my overall body fat is 25.1%. My goal is to get that into the 18-20% range, although that will take some work: clearly, everything I've been doing thus far isn't getting me anywhere. My current weight is 183.7 lbs: 176.8 lbs of tissue, 44.4 lbs fat, 132.4 lbs lean, 7.0 lbs bone mineral content. 32.6% of that fat is in the abdomen/belly area, 21% in the hips/pelvis --this is a relatively normal distribution, apple-shaped rather than pear-shaped. The arms have about 20.2% fat, legs 19.5%, trunk (chest+abdomen) 29.9%.

My arms and legs are fairly well balanced with nearly equal distributions of fat, bone & muscle in each. My left torso is slightly more developed than my right, probably a result of favouring my left side through the summer while my right shoulder was injured, but the difference isn't statistically huge.

In short, yeah, I have fat to lose. Losing a bit more than 5% of that fat would achieve my 2016 goals, a total of about 10 lbs off my current weight. Alternatively, I could gain 30 lbs of muscle while holding the fat stable, thus reducing the percentage fat to the same 20% level --which seems relatively unlikely although not an unworthy goal.

One of the major points I've come to appreciate is that I don't eat enough protein to get the muscle growth I'd like. In effect, I'm putting in the effort on the weight floor but not supporting my body's attempts to meet my demands. I'm not a professional weightlifter so a moderate goal of 1g per pound of lean body mass (gods, I hate mixed measuring systems, but that's the rule of thumb here) is appropriate. I now have DEXA proof my lean body mass is 139.3 lbs so I should be getting about 140g of protein daily. How hard can that be?

Well, there are six grams of protein in an egg, 38g in a cup of diced chicken, 8g in a cup of milk (interestingly, soy milk is exactly the same: 8g), 23g in a 3oz portion of steak. In short, yes, 140g is achievable but it's gonna take a huge amount of eating. About two dozen eggs or a quarter of diced chicken *daily*. And it would take still more if I really wanted to beef up.

At the moment, I have no idea how I'm going to do this: I've set aside some time this weekend to figure out how I could possible eat this much protein. There's probably going to be a lot of whey protein supplements in my future... any advice on this is welcome.

This weekend, I'm also going to revise my workout regimen, partly to shake up my routine a bit, and partly to stretch myself into areas I haven't ventured. My chest development lately is pretty good, but I want to work the upper chest more aggressively for a more balanced appearance. My legs are plenty strong so I don't feel a compelling need to keep hammering them more than the squats & inverted leg press work I already have, especially since a leg workout gets incorporated into many of my other full-body exercises. I anticipate fewer barbell and more dumbbell workouts in future, pushing for better balance and internal stabilization. And I need to get my neglected back & shoulders back up to par without re-injuring myself. The project never ends.

Date: 2015-12-31 10:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theoctothorpe.livejournal.com
Aaaaaand this is where we get into supplements.

Eating 'real' food to get 1g/lb LBM is nearly impossible — at least it is for me. Here's the other fun fact: your body can only process about 20g/hr of protein, so if you get a giant protein shake with 60g protein, most of that will go into the toilet. However, your body has a window where it can process roughly double that amount per hour (40g)… within an hour of your workout. As your body takes time to process solid food, the best bet is to go with a shake, rather than a bar.

There are a LOT of protein shakes on the market. 99% of them are crap. Different types of protein powders have different characteristics. Some are slow digesting, some are fast, some are simply 'efficient' (fast digesting and less filler). The thing you want to avoid is catabolism, so you need to use a combination of fast and slow digesting proteins, so your body never reaches a catabolic state.

We can go over details and such off-blog, as you've obviously done some research, and there is no sense in writing a book in this comment window.

January 2021

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 1st, 2026 12:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios