bjarvis: (Parliament back)
bjarvis ([personal profile] bjarvis) wrote2006-01-17 11:11 pm
Entry tags:

Canadian election coverage in the US

Fresh from the Canadian embassy in Washington DC...

C-SPAN intends to begin simulcasting the CBC election coverage at 9:00 pm EST and run until 1 am on either C-SPAN 1 or 2. The last polling stations in BC close at 10 pm EST, at which point Canadian media will begin announcing returns.

I'm probably going to head to the Elephant & Castle to join my fellow canucks to watch the results roll in. If nothing else, at least I'll be eating out instead of scrounging through the freezer for dinner. If you're in Washington DC, come join us. Live elsewhere in the US?

Across the United States, people are getting together to watch Canadian federal election returns come in on January 23. If you will be in or near Washington, DC, Atlanta, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago, Seattle, San Diego, Philadelphia, Raleigh-Durham or San Francisco, check out Connect2Canada.com to RSVP for an election event or to see further details.

[identity profile] billeyler.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
Scrounging through the FREEZER? eek!

[identity profile] bjarvis.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
My (un)holy trinity is "freezer - microwave - dishwasher".

If I'm eating by myself, I simply improvise something light out of the pantry or freezer; I'll cook something more elaborate if Kent is around. Alas, he has a chorus rehearsal on this particular election night.
qnetter: (Default)

[personal profile] qnetter 2006-01-18 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
As a lower-48er, it's odd to be seeing the right running on an anti-corruption message and the left running on an anti-incompetence message...!

But I do want to slap everyone voting Conservative and say, "No, you morons, look where it got *us*!"

[identity profile] bjarvis.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
From a distance, my observations go like this:

  • Canucks have a deeply embedded instinct to through the bums out --whoever they are-- after two terms. The Liberals tied a historic record with three consecutive majorities and were really on borrowed time with a fourth albeit minority term. If God himself were running the Liberals this past year, it would still have been an uphill fight to be re-elected. This was never Martin's campaign to win, but Harper's to lose.
  • The neo-Reformists are employing a clever bit of bait & switch. They have used the name "Conservative Party" even though they have nothing in common with the historical Conservatives of John A. MacDonald & successors or the modern Progressive-Conservatives of Diefenbaker, Clark or Mulroney. This is a different political creature co-opting familiar name, IMHO.
  • Harper & friends are intentionally soft-pedalling the more radical aspects of their platform. They got whupped for their extreme rightist social positions in the last two elections and they're not going to let it happen again.
  • A minority Conservative gov't is an expedient & moderately safe way of test-driving a new political entity without giving it carte blanche. The lack of obvious parliamentary partners can keep monetary extremism in check by threatening a non-confidence vote; while the Senate can't block money bills, they can tie up social & justice bills and the Liberals have a sizeable majority there.

In any case, perhaps I should set aside a little time in early February for an emergency flight back to Canada for a quickie marriage...